candi borobudur kerajaan di indonesia

Analisis Konten Integrasi STEM pada Buku Tematik Tema Globalisasi Materi Energi Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar

Safinatun Najah, Nurma Yunita Indriyanti, Riezky Maya Probosari

Abstract


Abstract: The quality of teaching material is important in supporting learning process. Teaching material  may also be used as a tool of communication and interaction between educators and students to achieve learning competencies. This study aims to find out the analysis result of Thematic Book on the Theme: Globalization of Energy in the 6th grade of Elementary School based on STEM integration aspects (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). This study used qualitative research with a content analysis approach. The samples used in this study are three thematic books on the theme of globalization for elementary school from three different publishers. Sampling technique used in this study is purposive sampling, while the data collection used by the author is documentation. The result of this study shows the existence of contents of the four STEM aspects that are analyzed in the three different thematic books on the theme of globalization. However, it was found that there was an unequal distribution ratio of STEM dominated by the category of science aspects. The analysis that has conducted by the author shows that the STEM aspect appears the most in book B with a percentage of 93,75% then followed by book C with 91,66% and book A with 91,42%. The most dominant aspect in the three books is science aspect which is contained highest in book C and contained lowest in book B. Meanwhile, the aspect that is contained the least in three books is Engineering which is contained highest in book A and lowest in book C. Through this study, it is hoped that teachers will be assisted to have experience in selecting teaching material which has good quality and will be used as a reference of teaching in 21st century. Furthermore, this study is expected to be used as a reference and evaluation material to revise the quality of books so that the distribution of every aspect presented is balanced.

Abstrak: Kualitas isi buku ajar sangat penting dalam mendukung proses pembelajaran. Buku ajar juga dapat berfungsi sebagai alat komunikasi dan sarana interaksi antara pendidik dengan peserta didik  untuk mencapai kompetensi pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hasil analisis Buku Tematik Tema Globalisasi Materi Energi Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar berdasarkan aspek integrasi STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan analisis isi (content analysis). Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah tiga buku tematik tema globalisasi sekolah dasar dari tiga penerbit yang berbeda. Teknik pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik penentuan (purposive sampling). Pengumpulan data melalui analisis yang dilakukan oleh peneliti dan rater pada setiap halaman buku tematik tema globalisasi. Analisis data menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil pada penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa adanya muatan keempat aspek STEM yang dianalisis pada ketiga buku tematik tema globalisasi yang dianalisis, namun ditemukan perbandingan sebaran yang tidak merata dengan didominasi kategori aspek Science. Analisis yang telah dilakukan menghasilkan bahwa aspek STEM yang paling banyak muncul yaitu pada buku B dengan presentase 93,75%. Kemudian dilanjut dengan buku C sebesar 91,66% dan yang terakhir buku A sebesar 91,42%. Aspek yang paling dominan pada ketiga buku adalah science yang dimuat paling tinggi pada buku C dan paling rendah pada buku B. Sedangkan aspek yang dimuat paling sedikit pada ketiga buku adalah Engineering dimana yang paling tinggi adalah buku A dan yang paling rendah adalah Buku C. Diharapkan dengan penelitian ini dapat membantu guru mempunyai pengalaman untuk memilih buku teks yang memiliki kualitas bagus yang akan dijadikan acuan dalam mengajar di abad 21 serta dapat dijadikan salah satu rujukan dan bahan evaluasi untuk memperbaiki kualiatas buku agar sebaran setiap aspek yang disajikan seimbang.


Keywords


: analisis isi, integrasi STEM, buku tematik Sekolah Dasar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agnezi, L., Khair, N., & Yolanda, S. (2019). Analisis Sajian Buku Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas X Semester 1 Terkait Komponen Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM). Padang: Universitas Padang.

Altan, E. B., & Ercan, S. (2016). STEM Education Program for Science Teachers: Perceptions and Competencies. Journal of Turkish Science Education. doi: 10.12973/tused.10174a

Ananda, R., & Fadhilaturrahmi. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Implementasi Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Riau: Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai.

Anggraeny, D., Nurlaili, D.A. & Mufidah, R.A. (2020). Analisis Teknologi Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar. Tangerang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

B.Gonzales, H., & J.Kuenzi, J. (2012). CRS Report for Congress Specialist in Education Policy. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Primer, 34.

Bybee, W Rodger. (2013). The Case for STEM Education Challenges and Oppartunities. Amerika: NSTA.

Carparo, R.M., dkk. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach (2nd Edition). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Cotabish, A., Dailey, D., Robinson, A., & Hughes, G. (2013). The Effects of a STEM Intervention on Elementary Students’ Science Knowledge and Skills. School Science and Mathematics, 113(5), 215–226. doi:10.1111/ssm.12023

Daugherty, M. K., Carter, V., & Swagerty, L. (2014). Elementary STEM Education: The Future for Technology and Engineering Education? Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.30707/jste49.1daugherty

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Duran, M., Höft, M., Medjahed, B., Lawson, D. B., & Orady, E. A. (Eds.). (2016). STEM Learning. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26179-9

Fajri, M. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis dalam Konteks Pembelajaran Abad 21 di Sekolah Dasar. Depok: SDN Pondok Petir Depok.

Fielding, M. (2012). Beyond student voice: Patterns of partnership and the demands of deep democracy. University of London. DOI: 10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2012-359-195

Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456. doi:10.1126/science.1240487

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2015). What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.

Khairiyah, N. (2019). Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering dan Mathematics (STEM). Bogor: Guepedia.

Liang Ting, Y. (2016). STEM from Perspectives of Engineering Design and Suggested Tools and Learning Design. National Taiwan Normal University. Journal of Research in STEM Education.

Lukas J. Hefty. (2015). STEM Gives Meaning to Mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(7), 422. doi:10.5951/teacchilmath.21.7.0422

Moore, T.J., Glancy, A. W., & Tank, K. M. (2014). A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Reseach and Development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER): https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/jpeer/vol4/iss1/2

Mowafi, Y., & Abumuhfouz, I. (2020). An Interactive Pedagogy in Mobile Context for Augmenting Early Childhood Numeric Literacy and Quantifying Skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 073563312094735. doi:10.1177/0735633120947351

Muspiroh, N. (2020). Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif IPA dan IPS di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah pada Kurikulum 2013. Cendekia Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan 14(1):75. DOI: 10.21154/cendekia.v14i1.548

Nurdyansyah. (2017). Sumber Daya dalam Teknologi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Nugiyantoro, B. (2008). Dasar-dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum Sekolah. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Oktapiani, N., & Hamdu, G. (2020). Desain Pembelajaran STEM Berdasarkan Kemampuan 4C di Sekolah Dasar. Tasikmalaya: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Raju, P., & Clayson, A. (2010). The Future of STEM Education: An Analysis of Two National Reports. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(5), 25–28.

Riyana, C. (2017). Peranan Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

ScienceBuddies. Engineering Design Process. Diakses pada 28 Januari 2021, dari https://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/engineering-design-process/engineering-design-process-steps.

Simarmata, J., dkk. (2020). Pembelajaran STEM Berbasis HOTS dan Penerapannya. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Supardi, K. (2017). Media Visual dan Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Flores: STKIP St Paulus Ruteng.

TeachEngineering STEM Curriculum for K-12. Engineering Design Process. University of Colorado Boulder. Diakses pada 28 Januari 2021, dari https://www.teachengineering.org/design/designprocess

Thananuwong, R. (2015). Learning Science from Toys: A Pathway to Successful Integrated STEM Teaching and Learning in Thai Middle School. Bangkok: The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology (IPST).

Trilling, B.,& Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey Bass.

Wijaya, E., Sudjimat, D., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Di Era Global. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Yuanita, & Kurnia F. (2019). Analisis STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Materi Kelistrikan pada Buku Tematik Tema 3 Kelas 6 Sekolah Dasar. Bangka Belitung: STKIP Muhammadiyah Bangka Belitung.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.