candi borobudur kerajaan di indonesia

Upaya Pengembangan Kreativitas dalam Bidang Pendidikan Sains : Analisis Bibliometrik

Lintang Rahmayanti, Sukarmin Sukarmin, Sentot Budi Rahardjo

Abstract


Abstract:. This research aims to reveal the scope of research about creativity in science education and provide systematic references through bibliometric analysis. The data used comes from the Scopus database which is limited to journal sources, published from 2013 to 2023, and uses the keywords "creativity" and "science education". The total articles obtained for bibliometric analysis were 198 documents. The results of bibliometric analysis show that the trend of creativity research in the field of science education has tended to increase in the last 10 years. The results are as follows: (1) related research is included in the “Social Science” field category with a percentage of 48.9%; (2) Bogner F.X. is the authors with the most studies on Creativity in Science Education; (3) the journal that most actively publishes studies on Creativity in Science Education is "Research In Science Education" journal with a total of 9 documents; (4) United States is the country with the largest number of publications in this field; (5) science education is the most frequently used keyword, appearing in 64 documents; and (6) based on Network Visualization analysis using the VOSviewer application, the way to develop creativity in science education can be carried out by implementing learning that trains collaboration skill and using an learning approach that integrates technology, engineering, art and mathematics or STEAM fields. Therefore, there is a need for further research to develop creativity in science education through collaborative learning and STEAM approach.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap ruang lingkup kajian kreativitas dalam pendidikan sains serta memberikan referensi sistematis melalui analisis bibliometrik. Data yang digunakan berasal dari database Scopus yang dibatasi pada sumber jurnal, dipublikasi pada 2013 hingga 2023, dan menggunakan kata kunci “creativity” dan “science education”. Total artikel yang diperoleh untuk analisis bibliometrik yaitu sebanyak 198 dokumen. Hasil analisis bibliometrik menunjukkan bahwa tren penelitian kreativitas dalam bidang sains cenderung naik dalam 10 tahun terakhir. Hasilnya adalah sebagai berikut: (1) penelitian terkait termasuk dalam kategori bidang “Social Science” dengan persentase 48,9%; (2) Bogner F.X. merupakan penulis dengan jumlah publikasi terbanyak; (3) jurnal yang paling aktif menerbitkan kajian mengenai kreativitas dalam pendidikan sains yaitu jurnal “Research In Science Education” dengan jumlah 9 dokumen; (4) United States adalah negara dengan jumlah publikasi terbanyak; (5) science education adalah kata kunci yang paling banyak digunakan, yaitu muncul pada 64 dokumen; serta (6) berdasarkan analisis Network Visualization menggunakan aplikasi VOSviewer, upaya pengembangan kreativitas dalam pendidikan sains dapat dilakukan dengan implementasi pembelajaran yang melatihkan kolaborasi dan menggunakan pendekatan yang mengintegrasikan bidang technology, engineering, art, dan mathematics atau STEAM. Oleh karena itu, perlunya adanya penelitian lebih lanjut untuk mengembangkan kreativitas dalam pendidikan sains melalui pembelajaran kolaboratif dan pendekatan STEAM.


Keywords


creativity, science education, STEAM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilera, David, and Jairo Ortiz-Revilla. 2021. “STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review.” Education Sciences 11(7):331. doi: 10.3390/educsci11070331.

Akcanca, Nur, and Lale Cerrah Ozsevgec. 2018. “Effect of Activities Prepared by Different Teaching Techniques on Scientific Creativity Levels of Prospective Pre-School Teachers.” European Journal of Educational Research 7(1):71–86. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.71.

Bertrand, Marja G., and Immaculate K. Namukasa. 2020. “STEAM Education : Student Learning and Transferable Skills.” 13(1):43–56. doi: 10.1108/JRIT-01-2020-0003.

Bhattacherjee, Anol. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. van Eck, Nees Jan, and Ludo Waltman. 2010. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 84(2):523–38. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

Gess, Ashley H. 2017. “STEAM Education: Separating Fact from Fiction.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 77 (3)(November):39–41.

Gu, X., D. Tong, P. Shi, Y. Zou, H. Yuan, C. Chen, and ... 2023. “Incorporating STEAM Activities into Creativity Training in Higher Education.” Thinking Skills and ….

Henriksen, D. 2014. “Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices.” The STEAM Journal.

Is education a social science?. (2017, September 4). Retrieved from https://blogs.harvard.edu/factual/is-education-a-social-science/

Karwowski, Maciej, Dorota M. Jankowska, Ronald A. Beghetto, and J. .. Kaufman. 2016. “Four Faces of Creativity at School.” Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (September):337–54. doi: 10.1017/9781316212899.019.

Knopf, Jeffrey W. 2006. “Doing a Literature Review.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39(1):127–32. doi: 10.1017/S1049096506060264.

Okpara, Friday. 2007. “The Value of Creativity And.” Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability III(2):17.

Ozdemir, Gokhan, and Ayhan Dikici. 2016. “Relationships between Scientific Process Skills and Scientific Creativity: Mediating Role of Nature of Science Knowledge.” Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health 3(1):52–52. doi: 10.21891/jeseh.275696.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2008. “21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness.” A Resource and Policy Guide 20.

Patmalasari, Dewi, Dian Septi Nur Afifah, and Gaguk Resbiantoro. 2017. “Karakteristik Tingkat Kreativitas Siswa Yang Memiliki Disposisi Matematis Tinggi Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika.” JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) 6(1):30. doi: 10.25273/jipm.v6i1.1509.

Ramadhani, Irham, and Motlan Sirait. 2015. “Efek Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Dengan Strategi Think Talk Write Dan Kreativitas Ilmiah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMA Pada Pelajaran Fisika.” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika 4(1):17. doi: 10.22611/jpf.v4i1.2564.

Sawyer, R. K. 2012. “Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation.” Oxford University Press.

Setyaningsih, Ira, Nurul Indarti, and Ferry Jie. 2018. “Bibliometric Analysis of the Term ‘Green Manufacturing.’” International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 11(3):315. doi: 10.1504/IJMCP.2018.093500.

Snyder, Hannah. 2019. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104:333–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.

Starko, Alane Jordan. 2014. Creativity in the Classroom: Schools of Curious Delight- 4th Edition. Vol. 14.

Yang, Kuay-Keng, Zuway-R. Hong, Ling Lee, and Huann-Shyang Lin. 2019. “Exploring the Significant Predictors of Convergent and Divergent Scientific Creativities.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 31:252–61. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.002.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.