STIMULASI KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI MENGGUNAKAN VARIASI PERTANYAAN DALAM GRUP DISKUSI FACEBOOK
Sari
In the context of online learning environments, the argumentation skill becomes an important priority for sustained engagement of students in productive negotiation of ideas and evidence based reasoning (Siakidou, Papadouris, & Constantinou, 2014). The aim of this study is to reveal the quality of argumentation skills stimulation used a variety of questions in Facebook group discussion for Biology student teachers. The method of this work was using quasi experiment with time series design. This study involved 24 Biology student teachers who contacted in online and expressed willingness to take part in Facebook group discussions. Results indicate that divergence questions types have a greater influence on the argumentation skills quantity rather than focal and brainstorming questions types, while the focal question types have a greater influence on the quantity of argumentation skills rather than brainstorming questions types. In addition, this study shows that brainstorming questions types (FA) have a better effect to coding scheme for individual arguments rather than focal questions types (NFA) and the divergent questions types (NJA) to stimulating the quality of argumentation skills of Biology student teachers. Further research to uncover the effect of topic discussion on the arguments quality is expected to enrich the findings in this study.
Keyword: Argumentation skills stimulation, variety of questions, Facebook group discussion
Teks Lengkap:
PDF (English)Referensi
Acar, O. (2008). Argumentation skills and conceptual knowledge of undergraduate students in a physics by inquiry class. Dissertation. USA: Ohio State University
Bond, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1): 210-230
Bonds-Raacke, J., & Raacke, J. (2010). Myspace and facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8 (1): 27-33
Ciardiello. A. V. (1998). Did you ask a good question today? alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. J Adolesc Adult Lit, 42(3), 210-219
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific
argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. Proceedings of CSCL 2002.
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills. Society for research in child development, 74 (5), 1245-1260
Michaels, S., O'Connor, C. and Resnick, L.B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education.
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
Pinkwart, N., & McLarren, M. B. (2012). Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills. USA: Bentham Science Publishers
Saeed, T., Khan, S., Ahmed, A., Gul, R., Cassum, S., & Parpio, Y. (2012). Development of students’ critical thinking: the educators’ ability to use questioning skills in the baccalaureate programmes in nursing in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc, 63(3):200-203.
Sellappah, S., Hussey. T., Blackmore. A. M., & McMurray. A. (1998). The use of questioning strategies by clinical teachers. J Adv Nurs, 28(1):142-148.
Siakidou, E., Papadouris, C., & Constantinou, P. C. (2014). An investigation of high-school students’ dialogic argumentation skills. http://www.esera.org/media/esera2013/Elena_Siakidou_06Feb2014.pdf
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
Sionti, M., Ai, H., Rosé, P. C., & Resnick, L. (2012). A framework for analyzing development of argumentation through classroom discussions. In Pinkwart, N., & McLarren, M. B. (Eds.), Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills. USA: Bentham Science Publishers
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, T. S. (2013). Best practice strategies for effective use of questions as a teaching tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7): 1-9
Veerman, A.L. and Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In Coirier P., & Andriessen J. E. B. (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing. Amsterdam University Press, the Netherlands.
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using facebook group as learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Study, 43(3): 428-438
Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293-312.
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (1), 35-62.
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.