candi borobudur kerajaan di indonesia

Analysis of Factors Affecting Digital Citizenship (Case Study at SMA N 3 Sukoharjo)

Siska Fitri Anggraheni, Triyanto Triyanto, Mohammad Muchtarom

Abstract


Microsoft's 2020 research on the level of digital politeness when interacting online placed Indonesia 29th out of 32 countries. The concept that helps to understand the norms of appropriate and responsible behavior in relation to the use of technology in the perspective of citizenship science by Al-Zahrani is called digital citizenship. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence digital citizenship. The research method used in this research is descriptive quantitative. The population of this study was students of SMA Negeri 3 Sukoharjo, the sample used in this study was 32 students. The sampling technique used in this study was random sampling. The data collection method in this study uses a questionnaire questionnaire in the form of a survey distributed via google forms with a modification of the instrument developed by Al-Zahrani which sees digital citizenship based on three main elements, namely 1) Respect, which includes etiquette, access, and law. 2) Educate, which includes communication, literacy, and commerce. 3) Protect, which includes rights and responsibility, safety health and welfare. The results and conclusions in this study show that students' attitudes when using technology (internet attitude); individual assessments of their ability to carry out behavior and conditioned to complete certain tasks in the field of technology (computer self-efficacy), and skills and fluency in using technology (computer expertise) have an influential relationship to digital citizenship.

Keyword : Digital Citizenship, Civic Education.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Zahrani. 2015. Toward Digital Citizenship: Examining Factors Affecting Participation and Involvement in the Internet Society among Higher Education Students. International Education Studies: 8 (12), 203-217

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: NY: W. H. Free man.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J.,

Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp.

-66). Springer Netherlands.

Chee, Y. S., Mehrotra, S., & Liu, Q. (2013).

Effective game based citizenship education in the age of new media. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11(1), 16-28

Diaz, Carlos, Byron G. Massialas, dan John A. Xanthopoulos. 1999. Perspektif Global untuk Pendidik. Boston: Allyn dan Bacon.

Indeks. 2021. Hak Atas Privasi dan Tantanganya di Era Digital. Retrieved September 16, 2023, form https://indeks.or.id/hak-atas-privasi- dan-tantangannya-di-era-digital/

Farmer, L. (2011). Teaching digital citizenship. Paper presented at the Global TIME 2011.

Hollandsworth, R., Dowdy, L., & Donovan, J. (2011). Digital citizenship in K-12: It takes a village. TechTrends, 55(4), 37-47

Kassam, A. (2013). Changing society using

new technologies: Youth participation in the social media revolution and its implications for the development of democracy in sub-Saharan Africa.

Education and Information

Technologies, 18(2), 253-263.

Kominfo. 2021. Status Literasi Digital di

Indonesia 2021.

Microsoft. 2021. Civility, Safety & Interaction Online. Retrieved September 16, 2023, form https://pskp.kemdikbud.go.id/assets_fr ont/images/produk/1- gtk/materi/2_Kondisi_Kesantunan_Di gital_Masyarakat,_Khususnya_Kalang an_Pelajar_dan_Mahasiswa%e2%80% 9d_(Benny_Kusuma,_Education_Lead _Microsoft_Indonesia).pdf

Miles, D. 2011. Youth Protection : Digital Citizenship – Principles & New Resources. EWI. 1-3

Oxley, C. (2011). Digital citizenship: Developing an ethical and responsible

online culture. Access, 25(3), 5-9

Ribble, M., Bailey, G. 2007. Digital Citizenship in Schools. Washington: ISTE

Ribble, M. (2014). Digital Citizenship: Using Technology Appropriately. Retrieved September 16, 2023, from http://digitalcitizenship.net/Home_Pag e.html

Roh, Y.-R. (2004). Democratic citizenship

education in the information age: A comparative study of South Korea and Australia. Asia Pacific Education

Review, 5(2), 167-177.

Shelley, M., Shulman, S., Lang, E., Beisser, S., & Mutiti, J. 2004. Digital citizenship: Parameters of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 256–269

Syaifullah., Affandi, A., Somantri, M.N. 2019.

Civic Education, Global Issues, and Global Citizen. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 418, 541-545

Roh, Y.-R. (2004). Democratic citizenship

education in the information age: A comparative study of South Korea and Australia. Asia Pacific Education

Review, 5(2), 167-177.

VanFossen, P. J., & Berson, M. J. (2008).

Civic literacy in a digital age. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 122-124.

Vannatta, R. (2007). The Intrepid Explorer:

A Model of Effective Technology Use for All Educators. In K.

Kumpulainen (Ed.), Educational Technology: Opportunities and Challenges. Finland: OULU

University Press, OULU 2007.

Wahab, A.A., & Sapriya. 2011. Teori dan Landasan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Bandung: CV Alfabeta

Zwart, M. d., Lindsay, D., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2011). Teenagers, Legal Risks and Social Networking Sites. Victoria, Australia: Monash University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2775-8818 (Online)