candi borobudur kerajaan di indonesia

Application of the Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm in Realizing Civic Disposition

Hanif Lugman Asrof

Abstract


The development of the times brings changes and can fade civic disposition or civic character. In this regard, Pancasila and Citizenship Education is a subject in schools that really teaches and embodies the character of citizenship. This study aims to describe the application of the Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm whether it can realize students' civic disposition. The research method used is descriptive qualitative research method with interview data collection techniques and literature studies. And in the end it can be concluded that the application of the Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm can realize the civic disposition of students so they can become smart and good citizenship.

Keywords: Civic Education; Ignatian Pedagogical Paradigm; Civic Disposition.


Full Text:

PDF

References


(ICAJE)., International Commission on the Apostolate of Jesuit Education. 1993. “Ignatian Pedagogy: A Practical Approach. In V. J. Duminico (Ed.).” The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum, 400th Anniversary Perspectives. (New York:): Fordham University Press.

(ICAJE), The International Commission on the Apostolate on Jesuit Education. 1993. “Jesuit Schools: A Living Tradition in the 21st Century.” An Ongoing Exercise of Discernment. 2nd Editio.

Dharma, Center for Learning Development and Quality Assurance (P3MP) Sanata University. ). Guidelines for Ignatian Pedagogy-Based Learning Models. Yogyakarta.

Duminuco, V . 1993. “Appendix B Ignatian Pedagogy: A Practical Approach.” In The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum: 400th Anniversary Perspectives; Duminiuco, V., Ed Fordham Un: 251–62.

———. 2000. “A New Ratio for a New Millennium? In The Jesuit Ratio Studiorum: 400th Anniversary Perspectives; Duminiuco, V., Ed.” Fordham University Press : 145–51.

Eyler, J. 2001. “Creating Your Reflection Map.” In Service-Learning: Practical Advice and Models In Service.

Gunawan, I. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods: Theory and Practice . Jakarta: Bumi Literacy. Hayes, C.X. 2006. “Paradoxes, Parallels and Pedagogy. A Case Study of Ignatian Pedagogy and of Teachers' Perceptions of Its Implementation in Australian Jesuits Schools.” Doctoral Dissertation, Australian

King,

Catholic University, Victoria.

P . 2000. “Learning to Make Reflective Judgments.” New Dir. Teaching Learning 82:

–26.

Margaret, and Stimman Branson. 1999. Learning

Civic Education from America . Yogyakarta:

LKiS.

Mohr, K.; Mohr, E. 2017. “Understanding

Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment.” J. Empowering Teach. Excell. : 84–94.

Mukhtar. 2013. Practical Methods of Qualitative Descriptive Research . Jakarta: Reference (GP Press Group).

Neuman, Lawrence W. 2003. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston. Ally and Bacon.

Quigley, C.N. 1991. “Civitas: A Frame Work for Civic Education.” (Calabasas): :Center for Civic Education.

Sanata, University Center of Learning

Development and Quality Assurance

(P3MP), and Dharma. 2012. "Guidelines for Learning Models Based on Ignatian Pedagogy." Yogyakarta.

Subagya, J SJ (ed). 2012. Reflective Pedagogy Paradigm . Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Trianto. 2009. Designing Innovative-Progressive Learning Models . Jakarta: Kencana.

Wahana, Paul. 2016. ""Recognizing the Reflective Pedagogical Paradigm Approach in Education to Develop Intelligent and Humane Humans." Didactics, Journal of Elementary Learning Science 5(1).

Winarno. 2014. Citizenship Education Learning: Content, Strategy, and Assessment. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.

Zubaidi, Kaelan and Achmad. 2012. Citizenship Education for Higher Education . Yogyakarta: Paradigm.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2775-8818 (Online)